Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Csoka v. United States, 00-1628 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-1628 Visitors: 14
Filed: Nov. 01, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1628 LOUIS A. CSOKA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT; RUDY LOZANO; JAMES T. MOODY; ALLEN SHARP, and the above Federal Judges; AMOCO OIL COMPANY, its management- Richard J. McGillivary, Jack Graham, Ralph Phillip, Michael VanAcker, Michael A. Doerner, Eric Weck, Vyt Lazauskas aka BP Amoco; UNKS; H. NASIF MAHMOUD, Attorney; WILLIAM H. WALDEN, Deputy Prosecutor/Attorney; CHARLES H. GRAD- DICK, City Judge
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1628 LOUIS A. CSOKA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT; RUDY LOZANO; JAMES T. MOODY; ALLEN SHARP, and the above Federal Judges; AMOCO OIL COMPANY, its management-- Richard J. McGillivary, Jack Graham, Ralph Phillip, Michael VanAcker, Michael A. Doerner, Eric Weck, Vyt Lazauskas aka BP Amoco; UNKS; H. NASIF MAHMOUD, Attorney; WILLIAM H. WALDEN, Deputy Prosecutor/Attorney; CHARLES H. GRAD- DICK, City Judge/Attorney; JOEL C. LEVY; STEVEN R. CRIST; PALMER C. SINGLETON, JR.; R. CORDELL FUNK; NELS KOMPIER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-00- 873-L) Submitted: October 26, 2000 Decided: November 1, 2000 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Louis A. Csoka, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Louis A. Csoka appeals from the district court’s order dis- missing his civil action and transferring the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Csoka’s motions for ap- pointed counsel, for a directed verdict, for a mandatory injunc- tion, and to correct omission, and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Csoka v. United States, No. CA-00-873-L (D. Md. Apr. 11, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer