Filed: Dec. 07, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1523 SHERRY D. BATTLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, and ELITE CHILD, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, versus KADOSH, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-99-857-2) Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 7, 2000 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per cur
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1523 SHERRY D. BATTLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, and ELITE CHILD, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, versus KADOSH, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-99-857-2) Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 7, 2000 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curi..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1523
SHERRY D. BATTLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
ELITE CHILD, INCORPORATED,
Plaintiff,
versus
KADOSH, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge.
(CA-99-857-2)
Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 7, 2000
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sherry D. Battle, Appellant Pro Se. Ira Michael Steingold, STEIN-
GOLD & MENDELSON, Portsmouth, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Sherry D. Battle appeals from the district court’s order dis-
missing a civil complaint filed by a corporation, Elite Child,
Inc., in which she is the sole shareholder. The notice of appeal
was signed only by Battle, who is not an attorney. It is well
settled that a corporation cannot appear in federal court except
through its attorney. Rowland v. California Men’s Colony,
506 U.S.
194, 201-02 (1993). Accordingly, we grant the Appellee’s motion to
dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2