Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Weaver v. Gordon Sevig Truck, 00-2023 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-2023 Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 21, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-2023 THERESA A. WEAVER, mother and next friend of Christina Weaver, a minor, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GORDON SEVIG TRUCKING COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee, and KEVIN CLAUDE NORTON, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-99-1155-WMN) Submitted: December 14, 2000 Decided: December 21, 2000 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and TR
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-2023 THERESA A. WEAVER, mother and next friend of Christina Weaver, a minor, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GORDON SEVIG TRUCKING COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee, and KEVIN CLAUDE NORTON, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-99-1155-WMN) Submitted: December 14, 2000 Decided: December 21, 2000 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Theresa A. Weaver, Appellant Pro Se. Steve Roy Migdal, SNIDER, BUCK, MIGDAL & MYERS, CHARTERED, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Theresa A. Weaver appeals the district court’s order granting Gordon Sevig Trucking Company’s motion for summary judgment in this wrongful death action. We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Weaver v. Gordon Sevig Trucking Co., No. CA-99-1155-WMN (D. Md. June 29, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer