Filed: Dec. 21, 2000
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6699 WALLACE MITCHELL-EL; CHARLES LINK, Plaintiffs - Appellants, and CARROLL MONTGOMERY; MICHAEL PAGE; EARNEST JOYNER; CLARK BROOKS; CHARLES WILKINS; WILLIAM D. GARNER; CLARENCE PAIGE-EL; GARFIELD RAT- CLIFF; REGINALD GAITHER; KEVIN BUTLER; KEVIN KING; MIKAIL AL MALIK; JAVIER CARD, Plaintiffs, versus YVONNE ELSWICK, Treatment Programs Supervisor, Red Onion State Prison; DAVID YERGER, M.D., Red Onion State Prison; GEORGE E.
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6699 WALLACE MITCHELL-EL; CHARLES LINK, Plaintiffs - Appellants, and CARROLL MONTGOMERY; MICHAEL PAGE; EARNEST JOYNER; CLARK BROOKS; CHARLES WILKINS; WILLIAM D. GARNER; CLARENCE PAIGE-EL; GARFIELD RAT- CLIFF; REGINALD GAITHER; KEVIN BUTLER; KEVIN KING; MIKAIL AL MALIK; JAVIER CARD, Plaintiffs, versus YVONNE ELSWICK, Treatment Programs Supervisor, Red Onion State Prison; DAVID YERGER, M.D., Red Onion State Prison; GEORGE E. D..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6699
WALLACE MITCHELL-EL; CHARLES LINK,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
and
CARROLL MONTGOMERY; MICHAEL PAGE; EARNEST
JOYNER; CLARK BROOKS; CHARLES WILKINS; WILLIAM
D. GARNER; CLARENCE PAIGE-EL; GARFIELD RAT-
CLIFF; REGINALD GAITHER; KEVIN BUTLER; KEVIN
KING; MIKAIL AL MALIK; JAVIER CARD,
Plaintiffs,
versus
YVONNE ELSWICK, Treatment Programs Supervisor,
Red Onion State Prison; DAVID YERGER, M.D.,
Red Onion State Prison; GEORGE E. DEEDS,
Warden, Red Onion State Prison; J. RASNAKE,
Correctional Officer, Red Onion State Prison;
EDWARD C. MORRIS, Deputy Director, Virginia
Department of Corrections; RONALD ANGELONE,
Director, Virginia Department of Corrections;
MARGARET A. MOORE, District of Columbia De-
partment of Corrections; EDMUND P. WALSH,
Administrator, DC Department of Corrections,
Case Management Services; JOHN H. THOMAS,
Executive Deputy Director, DC Department of
Corrections; CALVIN R. EDWARDS, Interim Direc-
tor, DC Department of Corrections; JAMES F.
MURPHY, Warden, Maximum Security Facility at
Lorton, Virginia; LACY GILCHRIST, Case Mana-
ger, Maximum Security Facility at Lorton, Vir-
ginia; IRMA BRADY, Case Manager Chief, Maximum
Security Facility at Lorton, Virginia; CASE
MANAGER COBB, Maximum Security Facility at
Lorton, Virginia; JOHN L. CLARK, Federal Cor-
rections Trustee, Federal Bureau of Prisons,
Washington, DC; VICTOR LOY, Warden, Central
Facility at Lorton, Virginia; JOSEPHINE DUMAS,
Case Manager, Central Facility at Lorton,
Virginia-All of the above individuals sued in
their personal and professional capacities;
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; DISTRICT
OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; R.
ROWLETTE, Major; R. FLEMING, Captain; L.
FLEMING, Captain; RONALD FOWLER, Lieutenant;
D. A. TAYLOR, Lieutenant; DR. BINKER; J.
BOLLING; E. MULLINS; DOCTOR REZA; DOCTOR
PAIGE; ROBERT FULTON, Major; NURSE LAMB; W. E.
MULLINS, Nurse; NURSE WOLFE; NURSE BROWNING;
HELEN DUNCAN; A. YOUNG; DOCTOR HARRIS; DOCTOR
HARRISON; D. FLEMING; J. ROSE; RUTHERFORD; S.
SAWYER; CHAPLAIN GARRICK; T. CORNETT; L. C.
HILL; LYNN GARLOCK; V. MULLINS; S. K. YOUNG;
PATRICIA RICH; R. FARMER; T. DAVIS; D.
MCKNIGHT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
Judge. (CA-99-51-7)
Submitted: December 14, 2000 Decided: December 21, 2000
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wallace Mitchell-El, Charles Link, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
2
PER CURIAM:
Wallace Mitchell-El and Charles Link appeal the district
court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West
Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Mitchell-El v.
Elswick, No. CA-99-51-7 (W.D. Va. Apr. 21, 2000). We deny Link’s
motion for appointment of counsel and to authorize a transcript at
government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3