Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

In re: Allnutt v., 00-1863 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-1863 Visitors: 15
Filed: Dec. 21, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1863 In Re: FRED W. ALLNUTT, SR., Debtor. FRED W. ALLNUTT, SR., a/k/a Sovereign Equipment Company, a/k/a Constitution Leasing Association, d/b/a Allnutt Excavating, a/k/a JFC Excavating, a/k/a Sovereign Equipment Association, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARK J. FRIEDMAN, Chapter 11 Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estates of Fred W. Allnutt, Sr., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Distric
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1863 In Re: FRED W. ALLNUTT, SR., Debtor. FRED W. ALLNUTT, SR., a/k/a Sovereign Equipment Company, a/k/a Constitution Leasing Association, d/b/a Allnutt Excavating, a/k/a JFC Excavating, a/k/a Sovereign Equipment Association, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARK J. FRIEDMAN, Chapter 11 Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estates of Fred W. Allnutt, Sr., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-99-641-WMN, BK-92-57401, AP-96-05598) Submitted: December 14, 2000 Decided: December 21, 2000 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gregory Joseph Swain, GREGORY J. SWAIN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, CHARTERED, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellant. Mark J. Friedman, Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Fred W. Allnutt, Sr., appeals the district court’s order af- firming the bankruptcy court’s orders closing his bankruptcy case, authorizing the trustee to dispose of books and records that Allnutt failed to retrieve, and denying his request to reopen the bankruptcy estate. Allnutt also challenges the district court’s denial of his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the opinions below and find no reversible error. Ac- cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. In re: Allnutt, Nos. CA-99-641-WMN; BK-92-57401; AP-96-05598 (D. Md. March 14 & May 25, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer