Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Miller v. Longacre, 00-2333 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-2333 Visitors: 29
Filed: Dec. 19, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-2333 DANIEL T. MILLER, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, and HELEN MELTON, Plaintiff, versus GLENN V. LONGACRE, JR.; WANDA LONGACRE; JOHN MOORE; HELEN MOORE; ANY AND ALL JOHN AND JANE DOE CLAIMANTS, Defendants - Appellees, and BROOKS RUN COAL COMPANY, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-175-2) Submitted: D
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-2333 DANIEL T. MILLER, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, and HELEN MELTON, Plaintiff, versus GLENN V. LONGACRE, JR.; WANDA LONGACRE; JOHN MOORE; HELEN MOORE; ANY AND ALL JOHN AND JANE DOE CLAIMANTS, Defendants - Appellees, and BROOKS RUN COAL COMPANY, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-175-2) Submitted: December 5, 2000 Decided: December 19, 2000 Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel T. Miller, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William Tracey Weber, Jr., WEBER & WEBER, Weston, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Daniel T. Miller appeals the district court’s judgment and order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his action to quiet title. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Miller v. Longacre, No. CA-96-175-2 (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 28, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer