Filed: Dec. 28, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1796 JAMES MESSER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-99-406-0-10) Submitted: December 5, 2000 Decided: December 28, 2000 Before LUTTIG and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opi
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1796 JAMES MESSER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-99-406-0-10) Submitted: December 5, 2000 Decided: December 28, 2000 Before LUTTIG and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opin..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1796
JAMES MESSER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CA-99-406-0-10)
Submitted: December 5, 2000 Decided: December 28, 2000
Before LUTTIG and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Palmer Freeman, Jr., SUGGS & KELLY, Columbia, South Carolina;
Lawrence C. Melton, BASTIANELLI, BROWN & KELLEY, CHTD., Washington,
D.C., for Appellant. J. Rene Josey, United States Attorney, Barbara
M. Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Caro-
lina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
James Messer appeals the district court’s order dismissing his
civil action under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1). We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s order on the grounds that the
independent contractor exception to the FTCA precludes Messer’s
claims against the United States. See Robb v. United States,
80
F.3d 884 (4th Cir. 1996). Because federal jurisdiction is lacking,
we decline to address whether Messer received full compensation for
his injuries through his settlement with joint tortfeasors in state
court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2