Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Huntington Mortgage v. Sherman, 00-1480 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-1480 Visitors: 22
Filed: Feb. 15, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1480 THE HUNTINGTON MORTGAGE COMPANY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RICHARD G. SHERMAN; TRACY O. HOBSON, Defendants - Appellees, and MORTGAGE POWER FINANCIAL SERVICES, INCORPO- RATED; JANG HOO JOO; HYUNG SON; JORGE ESTRADA; JOSE JOVEL, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-2498-AW) Submitted: January 31, 2001 Decid
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1480 THE HUNTINGTON MORTGAGE COMPANY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RICHARD G. SHERMAN; TRACY O. HOBSON, Defendants - Appellees, and MORTGAGE POWER FINANCIAL SERVICES, INCORPO- RATED; JANG HOO JOO; HYUNG SON; JORGE ESTRADA; JOSE JOVEL, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-2498-AW) Submitted: January 31, 2001 Decided: February 15, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Hansel H. Rhee, LEE & MCSHANE, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Ap- pellant. John R. Tjaden, Silver Spring, Maryland; Kevin Karpinski, ALLEN, JOHNSON, ALEXANDER & KARP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: The Huntington Mortgage Company appeals from the district court’s order awarding summary judgment to Richard Sherman and Tracy Hobson on its claim alleging negligent misrepresentation under Maryland law. Our review of the record, the parties’ briefs, and the district court’s opinions discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Hobson’s motion to file a surreply brief and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. The Huntington Mortgage Co. v. Sherman, No. CA-97-2498-AW (D. Md. filed Aug. 31, 1999; entered Sept. 3, 1999; filed Mar. 14, 2000; entered Mar. 15, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer