UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7169 CHARLES MICHAEL MITCHELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CHIEF AUSTIN; PAUL MEAD, and all other con- cerned parties of the Columbia City Police Department, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-99-1620-0-23BD) Submitted: February 6, 2001 Decided: February 20, 2001 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Michael Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Gordon Cooper, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Charles Michael Mitchell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) com- plaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion agreeing with the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant summary judgment to the Appellees* and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mitchell v. Austin, No. CA-99-1620-0-23BD (D.S.C. Aug. 2, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * Appellees are Charles Austin, Chief of Police for the City of Columbia, South Carolina, and Paul Mead, an investigator with the Columbia City Police Department. 2