Filed: Mar. 01, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7595 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus HERBERT FENNER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CR-95- 95-MJG, CA-99-3624-MJG) Submitted: February 22, 2001 Decided: March 1, 2001 Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opin
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7595 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus HERBERT FENNER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CR-95- 95-MJG, CA-99-3624-MJG) Submitted: February 22, 2001 Decided: March 1, 2001 Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opini..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7595
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
HERBERT FENNER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CR-95-
95-MJG, CA-99-3624-MJG)
Submitted: February 22, 2001 Decided: March 1, 2001
Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Herbert Fenner, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Herbert Fenner appeals the district court’s order denying his
motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000) and denying
his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and
dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United
States v. Fenner, Nos. CR-95-95-MJG; CA-99-3624-MJG (D. Md. filed
July 12, 2000; entered July 13, 2000; filed Oct. 24, 2000; entered
Oct. 25, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2