Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Choice v. Patterson, 00-7691 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-7691 Visitors: 19
Filed: Mar. 01, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7691 KEVIN L. CHOICE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus P. PATTERSON, Officer; NFN JERNAGIN, Sergeant, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-99-4099-0-18BD) Submitted: February 22, 2001 Decided: March 1, 2001 Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublishe
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7691 KEVIN L. CHOICE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus P. PATTERSON, Officer; NFN JERNAGIN, Sergeant, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-99-4099-0-18BD) Submitted: February 22, 2001 Decided: March 1, 2001 Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kevin L. Choice, Appellant Pro Se. Terry B. Millar, Rock Hill, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Kevin L. Choice, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find that this ap- peal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the rea- soning of the district court. See Choice v. Patterson, No. CA-99- 4099-0-18BD (D.S.C. filed Nov. 1, 2000; entered Nov. 2, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer