Case vacated and remanded by Supreme Court order filed 2/23/01  UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-4559 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILFREDO GONZALEZ LORA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CR-98-358-A) Submitted: March 9, 2000 Decided: March 15, 2000 Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward Blair Brown, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Thomas More Hollenhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora appeals the district court’s order de- nying his motion for a new trial based upon newly discovered evi- dence under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and agree with the district court that the evidence in question was not newly discovered. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order denying Lora’s motion. See United States v. Lora, No. CR-98-358-A (E.D. Va. July 28, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3