Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Young v. Cushwa, 00-7332 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-7332 Visitors: 469
Filed: Mar. 08, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7332 ANDRE YOUNG, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PATRICIA CUSHWA, Chairperson, Maryland Parole Commission, sued in her official and individ- ual capacity; FRANK PAPPAS, Commissioner, Maryland Parole Commission, sued in his offi- cial and individual capacity; NORMAN GERMINO, Commissioner, Maryland Parole Commission, sued in his official and individual capacity; STUART O. SIMMS, Secretary, Public Safety and Correctional Servic
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7332 ANDRE YOUNG, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PATRICIA CUSHWA, Chairperson, Maryland Parole Commission, sued in her official and individ- ual capacity; FRANK PAPPAS, Commissioner, Maryland Parole Commission, sued in his offi- cial and individual capacity; NORMAN GERMINO, Commissioner, Maryland Parole Commission, sued in his official and individual capacity; STUART O. SIMMS, Secretary, Public Safety and Correctional Services, sued in his official and individual capacity; WILLIAM W. SONDERVAN, Ed.D., Commissioner, Maryland Division of Cor- rections, sued in his official and individual capacity; ALEXANDER FRANCIS, Warden, Maryland Correctional Pre-Release System, sued in his official and individual capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-00-77-AW) Submitted: February 20, 2001 Decided: March 8, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andre Young, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Andre Young appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Young’s motion to consoli- date and his motion for appointment of counsel, and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Young v. Cushwa, No. CA-00- 77-AW (D. Md. filed Aug. 30; entered Aug. 31, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer