UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7500 WILLIAM MORRIS GRANT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SAM D. O'KELLY; WILLIAM D. CATOE, Director of SCDC; SUSAN LITZ, Accountant; IVYL S. HUDSON; BENJAMIN MONTGOMERY; J. MUNSFORD SCOTT; RICKY HARRIS; JANE DOE; ROBERT E. WARD; KENNY GREEN, Lieutenant; J. ROLLINGS; DERWIN NEASMAN; OFFI- CER MILLER; OFFICER MCDOUGAL; OFFICER ROBIN- SON; OFFICER SPRATTLING, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (CA-99-2755-3-24-BC) Submitted: February 28, 2001 Decided: March 23, 2001 Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Morris Grant, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Foster McLeod, HARRIS & MCLEOD, Cheraw, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: William Grant appeals the district court’s order denying re- lief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Grant v. O’Kelly, No. CA-99-2755-3-24-BC (D.S.C. Sept. 29, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2