Filed: Mar. 29, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-2407 BETTY B. WELCH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WAL-MART STORES, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-00-776-3-19) Submitted: February 28, 2001 Decided: March 29, 2001 Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dwi
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-2407 BETTY B. WELCH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WAL-MART STORES, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-00-776-3-19) Submitted: February 28, 2001 Decided: March 29, 2001 Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dwig..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-2407 BETTY B. WELCH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WAL-MART STORES, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-00-776-3-19) Submitted: February 28, 2001 Decided: March 29, 2001 Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dwight C. Moore, MOORE LAW FIRM, L.L.C., Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellant. J. R. Murphy, MURPHY & GRANTLAND, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: In this personal injury action, Betty B. Welch appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Wal- Mart Stores, Inc. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs, the joint appendix, and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Welch v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. CA-00-776-3-19 (D.S.C. Sept. 29, 2000). We grant Appellant’s motion to submit the case on briefs without oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument will not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2