Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Made USA Foundation v. America Online Inc, 00-2310 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-2310 Visitors: 52
Filed: Apr. 25, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-2310 MADE IN THE USA FOUNDATION, INCORPORATED; JOEL D. JOSEPH, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus AMERICA ONLINE, INCORPORATED; STEVEN CASE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-1072-A) Submitted: April 13, 2001 Decided: April 25, 2001 Before NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Se
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-2310 MADE IN THE USA FOUNDATION, INCORPORATED; JOEL D. JOSEPH, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus AMERICA ONLINE, INCORPORATED; STEVEN CASE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-1072-A) Submitted: April 13, 2001 Decided: April 25, 2001 Before NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joel D. Joseph, Washington, D.C., for Appellants. Everett C. Johnson, Jr., Michael J. Golden, LATHAM & WATKINS, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Made In the USA Foundation, Inc., and Joel D. Joseph appeal the district court’s order dismissing their suit. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Made in the USA Foundation, Inc. v. America Online, Inc., No. CA-00-1072-A (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 23, 2000; entered Aug. 24, 2000). We deny Appellees’ motion for Fed. R. App. P. 38 sanc- tions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer