Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Britton v. Constantine, 00-7818 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-7818 Visitors: 18
Filed: Apr. 24, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7818 PATRICK BRITTON, a/k/a Gary Louis Ellis, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THOMAS A. CONSTANTINE, Administrator, Drug Enforcement Administration; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-00- 2524-L) Submitted: March 30, 20
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7818 PATRICK BRITTON, a/k/a Gary Louis Ellis, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THOMAS A. CONSTANTINE, Administrator, Drug Enforcement Administration; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-00- 2524-L) Submitted: March 30, 2001 Decided: April 24, 2001 Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Patrick Britton, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Charles Kay, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Patrick Britton appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Britton v. Constantine, No. CA-00-2524-L (D. Md. Nov. 27, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer