Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Brown v. Doss, 01-6338 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 01-6338 Visitors: 3
Filed: Apr. 23, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6338 JOHN WAYNE BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CAPTAIN DOSS; OFFICER CARTER; OFFICER DUVAL; OFFICER MASON; OFFICER EDWARDS; OFFICER LARI- MORE; OFFICER WEST; ROBIN HOGGE, Lieutenant; JOHN DOE, Officer; JANE DOE, Officer; MAJOR DIGGS; SHERIFF STANAWAY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-9
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6338 JOHN WAYNE BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CAPTAIN DOSS; OFFICER CARTER; OFFICER DUVAL; OFFICER MASON; OFFICER EDWARDS; OFFICER LARI- MORE; OFFICER WEST; ROBIN HOGGE, Lieutenant; JOHN DOE, Officer; JANE DOE, Officer; MAJOR DIGGS; SHERIFF STANAWAY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-1442-A) Submitted: April 12, 2001 Decided: April 23, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Wayne Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: John Wayne Brown appeals from a district court order dismiss- ing without prejudice his complaint alleging civil rights viola- tions under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Brown’s motion for appoint- ment of counsel on appeal and affirm on the reasoning of the dis- trict court. See Brown v. Doss, No. CA-99-1442-A (E.D. Va. Jan. 9, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer