Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Diaz v. Washington Cnty Det, 01-6181 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 01-6181 Visitors: 25
Filed: May 04, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6181 RALPH ANTHONY DIAZ, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WASHINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; FIRST SERGEANT BLAIR; D. LOGAN, Deputy; SERGEANT WEICHT; SERGEANT WHITTINGTON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA- 00-2179-S) Submitted: April 27, 2001 Decided: May 4, 2001 Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges,
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6181 RALPH ANTHONY DIAZ, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WASHINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; FIRST SERGEANT BLAIR; D. LOGAN, Deputy; SERGEANT WEICHT; SERGEANT WHITTINGTON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA- 00-2179-S) Submitted: April 27, 2001 Decided: May 4, 2001 Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ralph Anthony Diaz, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gerard Comeau, John Trahey Beamer, II, LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL G. COMEAU, Balti- more, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Ralph Anthony Diaz, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) com- plaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Diaz v. Washington County De- tention Ctr., No. CA-00-2179-S (D. Md. filed Jan. 9, 2001; entered Jan. 10, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer