Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ahmed v. Schnatter, 01-1238 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 01-1238 Visitors: 6
Filed: May 04, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1238 SHAMIM AHMED, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN H. SCHNATTER; ED WINKLER; MARK HAMOND; PAPA JOHN’S USA, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA- 00-2160-S) Submitted: April 27, 2001 Decided: May 4, 2001 Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge. Affirmed by u
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1238 SHAMIM AHMED, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN H. SCHNATTER; ED WINKLER; MARK HAMOND; PAPA JOHN’S USA, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA- 00-2160-S) Submitted: April 27, 2001 Decided: May 4, 2001 Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Shamim Ahmed, Appellant Pro Se. Peter David Guattery, WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant Shamim Ahmed appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees on his claims of employment discrimination on the basis of race and national origin. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the district court’s reasoning that Ahmed failed to timely file a charge of discrimination. See Ahmed v. Schnatter, No. CA-00-2160-S (D. Md. Feb. 8, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer