Filed: May 23, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7764 In Re: MICHAEL SCOTT MCRAE, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-00-465) Submitted: April 30, 2001 Decided: May 23, 2001 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Scott McRae, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Michael Scott McRa
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7764 In Re: MICHAEL SCOTT MCRAE, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-00-465) Submitted: April 30, 2001 Decided: May 23, 2001 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Scott McRae, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Michael Scott McRae..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7764 In Re: MICHAEL SCOTT MCRAE, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-00-465) Submitted: April 30, 2001 Decided: May 23, 2001 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Scott McRae, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Michael Scott McRae has petitioned this Court for a writ of mandamus to compel the district court to act in his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000) motion. Because the district court has issued a final order denying McRae’s § 2255 motion, his petition for mandamus relief is moot. Accordingly, we deny it as such.* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED * We grant, however, McRae’s motion to proceed without prepay- ment of fees. 2
