Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Anderson v. Davis, 01-1533 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 01-1533 Visitors: 20
Filed: Jun. 08, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1533 T. JAMES ANDERSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ANDRE DAVIS, Honorable, District Court Judge, United States District Court, Defendant - Appellee. No. 01-1534 T. JAMES ANDERSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ANDRE DAVIS, Honorable, District Court Judge, United States District Court, Defendant - Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg,
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1533 T. JAMES ANDERSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ANDRE DAVIS, Honorable, District Court Judge, United States District Court, Defendant - Appellee. No. 01-1534 T. JAMES ANDERSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ANDRE DAVIS, Honorable, District Court Judge, United States District Court, Defendant - Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-01- 846-L, CA-01-906-L) Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 8, 2001 Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. T. James Anderson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: T. James Anderson appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaints under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(iii) (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the records and the district court’s opinions and find that these appeals present no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Anderson v. Davis, Nos. CA-01-846-L; CA-01-906-L (D. Md. Mar. 26 & 28, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer