Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Givens v. City of Salisbury, 00-2384 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-2384 Visitors: 43
Filed: Jun. 06, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-2384 JERYL GIVENS; DEBRA GIVENS, personal represen- tative of the estate of Jeryl Givens, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus THE CITY OF SALISBURY; AARON HUDSON, Salisbury Police Officer; LARRY JONES, Salisbury Police Officer; RYAN MITCHELL, Salisbury Police Offi- cer; UNKNOWN OFFICER OF THE CITY OF SALISBURY, Defendants - Appellees, MARK TYLER, Salisbury Police Officer, Party-in-interest. Appeal from the United States Distric
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-2384 JERYL GIVENS; DEBRA GIVENS, personal represen- tative of the estate of Jeryl Givens, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus THE CITY OF SALISBURY; AARON HUDSON, Salisbury Police Officer; LARRY JONES, Salisbury Police Officer; RYAN MITCHELL, Salisbury Police Offi- cer; UNKNOWN OFFICER OF THE CITY OF SALISBURY, Defendants - Appellees, MARK TYLER, Salisbury Police Officer, Party-in-interest. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-99- 146-MJG) Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 6, 2001 Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Debra Givens, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Karp, ALLEN, JOHNSON, ALEX- ANDER & KARP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Debra Givens, personal representative of the estate of Jeryl Givens,* appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Givens v. City of Salisbury, No. CA-99-146-MJG (D. Md. Sept. 28, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * Jeryl Givens passed away while his case was pending before the district court. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer