Filed: Jul. 05, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6716 ST. CLAIR A. ALLMOND, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CHRISTOPHER PREUSS, Sergeant; ERVIN J. TAYLOR, Officer; VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY PO- LICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-01-246-2) Submitted: June 21, 2001 Decided: July 5, 2001 Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6716 ST. CLAIR A. ALLMOND, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CHRISTOPHER PREUSS, Sergeant; ERVIN J. TAYLOR, Officer; VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY PO- LICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-01-246-2) Submitted: June 21, 2001 Decided: July 5, 2001 Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, a..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6716 ST. CLAIR A. ALLMOND, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CHRISTOPHER PREUSS, Sergeant; ERVIN J. TAYLOR, Officer; VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY PO- LICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-01-246-2) Submitted: June 21, 2001 Decided: July 5, 2001 Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. St. Clair A. Allmond, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: St. Clair A. Allmond appeals the district court’s order deny- ing relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Allmond v. Preuss, No. CA-01-246-2 (E.D. Va. Apr. 17, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
