Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Vogrin v. Bureau of Alcohol, 01-1491 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 01-1491 Visitors: 16
Filed: Jul. 03, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1491 STEPHEN T. VOGRIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO AND FIREARMS; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Dis- trict Judge. (CA-98-117-5) Submitted: June 20, 2001 Decided: July 3, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1491 STEPHEN T. VOGRIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO AND FIREARMS; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Dis- trict Judge. (CA-98-117-5) Submitted: June 20, 2001 Decided: July 3, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stephen T. Vogrin, Appellant Pro Se. Michael C. Colville, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Colette Gianna Matzzie, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Stephen T. Vogrin appeals the district court’s order granting the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms’ motion to dismiss. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s memorandum opin- ion and order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Vogrin v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms, No. CA-98-117-5 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer