Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

McCarroll v. Hunt, 01-6872 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 01-6872 Visitors: 1
Filed: Jul. 20, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6872 EDWARD LONNIE MCCARROLL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JIM HUNT, Governor; MIKE EASLEY, Attorney General; THEOTIS BECK, Secretary of Correc- tions; BOYD BENNETT, Director of Prisons; JAMES FRENCH, Superintendent; RAFAEL HALL, Superintendent, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-173-3-
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6872 EDWARD LONNIE MCCARROLL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JIM HUNT, Governor; MIKE EASLEY, Attorney General; THEOTIS BECK, Secretary of Correc- tions; BOYD BENNETT, Director of Prisons; JAMES FRENCH, Superintendent; RAFAEL HALL, Superintendent, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-173-3-MU) Submitted: July 12, 2001 Decided: July 20, 2001 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward Lonnie McCarroll, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Edward Lonnie McCarroll appeals the district court’s order de- nying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McCarroll v. Hunt, No. CA-01-173-3-MU (W.D.N.C. May 17, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer