Filed: Jul. 24, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6620 CHARLES ANTON MCKAIN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JOSEPH M. BROOKS, Warden, FCI, Petersburg; JANET RENO, Attorney General; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-01-75) Submitted: July 12, 2001 Decided: July 24, 2001 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Af
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6620 CHARLES ANTON MCKAIN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JOSEPH M. BROOKS, Warden, FCI, Petersburg; JANET RENO, Attorney General; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-01-75) Submitted: July 12, 2001 Decided: July 24, 2001 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Aff..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6620 CHARLES ANTON MCKAIN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JOSEPH M. BROOKS, Warden, FCI, Petersburg; JANET RENO, Attorney General; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-01-75) Submitted: July 12, 2001 Decided: July 24, 2001 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Anton McKain, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Charles Anton McKain appeals the district court’s order dis- missing without prejudice his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s memorandum and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McKain v. Brooks, No. CA-01-75 (E.D. Va. Mar. 8, 2001). We grant McKain leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
