Filed: Aug. 01, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7728 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DAVID BRYANT WICKS, JR., a/k/a David Bryant Jones, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CR-96-593, CA-00-2452-3-19) Submitted: May 18, 2001 Decided: August 1, 2001 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curia
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7728 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DAVID BRYANT WICKS, JR., a/k/a David Bryant Jones, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CR-96-593, CA-00-2452-3-19) Submitted: May 18, 2001 Decided: August 1, 2001 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7728
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DAVID BRYANT WICKS, JR., a/k/a David Bryant
Jones,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.
(CR-96-593, CA-00-2452-3-19)
Submitted: May 18, 2001 Decided: August 1, 2001
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Bryant Wicks, Appellant Pro Se. Eric William Ruschky,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
David Bryant Wicks, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
denying his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000) motion. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-
ability and dismiss the appeal, relying on United States v.
Sanders, F.3d ,
2001 WL 369719 (4th Cir. Apr. 13, 2001) (No.
00-6281), and United States v. Pregent,
190 F.3d 279, 284 n.5 (4th
Cir. 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2