Filed: Jul. 31, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1261 MICHAEL R. MORELAND, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STATE OF MARYLAND, and its instrumentalities, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-01-99-WMN) Submitted: July 26, 2001 Decided: July 31, 2001 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael R. More
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1261 MICHAEL R. MORELAND, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STATE OF MARYLAND, and its instrumentalities, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-01-99-WMN) Submitted: July 26, 2001 Decided: July 31, 2001 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael R. Morel..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1261 MICHAEL R. MORELAND, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STATE OF MARYLAND, and its instrumentalities, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-01-99-WMN) Submitted: July 26, 2001 Decided: July 31, 2001 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael R. Moreland, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Michael R. Moreland appeals the district court’s order dis- missing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is friv- olous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Moreland v. Maryland, No. CA-01-99-WMN (D. Md. filed Jan. 23, 2001; entered Jan. 24, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
