Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Sec of Congress v. Chief Clerk, US Dist, 01-1829 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 01-1829 Visitors: 40
Filed: Aug. 29, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1829 SECRETARY OF CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES, a/k/a Aaron H. Brooks, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THE CHIEF CLERK OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF MARYLAND; THE CHIEF OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA; THE SAID STATE OF MARYLAND; ATTOR- NEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND; CHAIR- MAN OF THE STATE HALL OF RECORDS COMMISSION; CHAIRMAN OF THE STATE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ON RULES; DISTR
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1829 SECRETARY OF CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES, a/k/a Aaron H. Brooks, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THE CHIEF CLERK OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF MARYLAND; THE CHIEF OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA; THE SAID STATE OF MARYLAND; ATTOR- NEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND; CHAIR- MAN OF THE STATE HALL OF RECORDS COMMISSION; CHAIRMAN OF THE STATE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ON RULES; DISTRICT COURT JUDGES OF WABASH DIS- TRICT; COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL DISABILITIES; STEVEN P. LEMMEY; BALTIMORE CITY FIRE DE- PARTMENT; SUPREME BENCH OF BALTIMORE CITY, individually and in his/her official capacity and any and all other so named persons, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-01- 1620-MJG) Submitted: August 23, 2001 Decided: August 29, 2001 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Secretary of Congress of the United States, a/k/a Aaron H. Brooks, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Secretary of Congress of the United States, a/k/a Aaron H. Brooks, appeals the district court’s order dismissing as frivolous his civil rights complaint construed as a 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Secretary of Congress v. Chief Clerk, No. CA-01-1620-MJG (D. Md. filed June 11, 2001; entered June 12, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer