Filed: Oct. 12, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7412 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus STANLEY ASHER COLE, a/k/a Oscar Ivan Cole, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CR-87-139-JFM, CA-01-1907-JFM) Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 12, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per cur
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7412 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus STANLEY ASHER COLE, a/k/a Oscar Ivan Cole, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CR-87-139-JFM, CA-01-1907-JFM) Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 12, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curi..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7412 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus STANLEY ASHER COLE, a/k/a Oscar Ivan Cole, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CR-87-139-JFM, CA-01-1907-JFM) Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 12, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stanley Asher Cole, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Matthew Schenning, United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Stanley Asher Cole appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001) and de- nying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Cole, Nos. CR-87-139-JFM; CA-01-1907-JFM (D. Md. Jul. 10, 2001 & Aug. 14, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2