Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Jones, 01-6648 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 01-6648 Visitors: 40
Filed: Oct. 17, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6648 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus FREDDIE JONES, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-93-79-BO, CA-00-42-5-BO) Submitted: September 28, 2001 Decided: October 17, 2001 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6648 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus FREDDIE JONES, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-93-79-BO, CA-00-42-5-BO) Submitted: September 28, 2001 Decided: October 17, 2001 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Freddie Jones, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Freddie Jones, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001), and denying his motions to alter or amend, for recusal, and for a certificate of appealability. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal- ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jones, Nos. CR-93-79-BO; CA-00-42-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 12, 2000; Feb. 17, 2001; May 1 & 7, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer