Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bazarov v. Hulse, 01-1070 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 01-1070 Visitors: 10
Filed: Oct. 25, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1070 IGOR A. BAZAROV, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARY HULSE, Fairfax County Police; R. M. THEAL, Fairfax County Police; FAIRFAX COUNTY, Virginia, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-99-1965-A) Submitted: October 18, 2001 Decided: October 25, 2001 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1070 IGOR A. BAZAROV, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARY HULSE, Fairfax County Police; R. M. THEAL, Fairfax County Police; FAIRFAX COUNTY, Virginia, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-99-1965-A) Submitted: October 18, 2001 Decided: October 25, 2001 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert J. Hill, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellant. David P. Bobzien, County Attorney, Robert Lyndon Howell, Deputy County Attorney, Edward E. Rose, III, Assistant County Attorney, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Igor A. Bazarov appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bazarov v. Hulse, No. CA-99-1965-A (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 4, 2000; entered Dec. 5, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer