Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Dawkins, 01-6862 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 01-6862 Visitors: 14
Filed: Dec. 05, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6862 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JAMES EDWARD DAWKINS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (CR-95-9-V, CA-98-32-5-2-V) Submitted: November 29, 2001 Decided: December 5, 2001 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opini
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6862 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JAMES EDWARD DAWKINS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (CR-95-9-V, CA-98-32-5-2-V) Submitted: November 29, 2001 Decided: December 5, 2001 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Edward Dawkins, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Thomas Church, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: James Edward Dawkins appeals from the district court’s order declining to grant Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) relief from the final order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Dawkins, Nos. CR-95-9-V; CA-98-32-5-2-V (W.D.N.C. filed May 1, 2001; entered May 9, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer