Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Swayzer v. US Dept of Defense, 01-1624 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 01-1624 Visitors: 17
Filed: Dec. 12, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1624 THINEMAR SWAYZER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (99-1407-A) Submitted: November 27, 2001 Decided: December 12, 2001 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James A.
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1624 THINEMAR SWAYZER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (99-1407-A) Submitted: November 27, 2001 Decided: December 12, 2001 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James A. Endicott, Jr., Harker Heights, Texas, for Appellant. Kenneth E. Melson, United States Attorney, Dennis E. Szybala, As- sistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Thinemar Swayzer appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action alleging discrimination under the Rehabilitation Act. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the rea- soning of the district court. See Swayzer v. United States Dep’t of Defense, No. 99-1407-A (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 6, 2001; entered Mar. 7, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer