Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Paul, 01-7413 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 01-7413 Visitors: 29
Filed: Jan. 02, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7413 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TOBARIS ANIBAL PAUL, a/k/a Big Shot, a/k/a Shot, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CR-97-9-4, CA-99-120-4) Submitted: December 20, 2001 Decided: January 2, 2002 Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished pe
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7413 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TOBARIS ANIBAL PAUL, a/k/a Big Shot, a/k/a Shot, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CR-97-9-4, CA-99-120-4) Submitted: December 20, 2001 Decided: January 2, 2002 Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tobaris Anibal Paul, Appellant Pro Se. Janet S. Reincke, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Tobaris Anibal Paul seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif- icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Paul, Nos. CR-97-9-4; CA- 99-120-4 (E.D. Va. dated July 17, 2001, entered July 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer