Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Peltier v. Greyhound Lines Inc, 01-2129 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 01-2129 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 18, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-2129 BRIAN E. PELTIER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GREYHOUND LINES, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-00-1726-2-18AJ) Submitted: December 28, 2001 Decided: January 18, 2002 Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brian E. Peltier, Appe
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-2129 BRIAN E. PELTIER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GREYHOUND LINES, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-00-1726-2-18AJ) Submitted: December 28, 2001 Decided: January 18, 2002 Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brian E. Peltier, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Lynwood Brown, YOUNG, CLEMENT, RIVERS & TISDALE, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Brian E. Peltier appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to his former employer in his civil action in which he alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Family Medical Leave Act. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s re- port and recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Peltier v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., No. CA-00-1726-2-18AJ (D.S.C. Aug. 7, 2001). We also deny Peltier’s motion for formal briefing. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer