Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Gray v. Cohen, 00-1806 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-1806 Visitors: 31
Filed: Jan. 18, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1806 EUGENE GRAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee, and MEDICAL COLLEGE OF VIRGINIA; JOEL SILVERMAN, Doctor, in his individual and official capacity, Defendants. No. 00-2216 EUGENE GRAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus U. S. DEFENSE COMMISSARY AGENCY; WILLIAM S. COHEN, Secretary, Department of Defense, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Ea
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1806 EUGENE GRAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee, and MEDICAL COLLEGE OF VIRGINIA; JOEL SILVERMAN, Doctor, in his individual and official capacity, Defendants. No. 00-2216 EUGENE GRAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus U. S. DEFENSE COMMISSARY AGENCY; WILLIAM S. COHEN, Secretary, Department of Defense, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-99-255-3, CA-99-838-3) Submitted: October 31, 2001 Decided: January 18, 2002 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Beverly D. Crawford, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Kenneth E. Melson, United States Attorney, Joan E. Evans, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM: Eugene Gray appeals from the district court’s orders dismiss- ing his employment discrimination and related civil claims. Our review of the record, the parties’ briefs, and the opinions of the district court discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gray v. Cohen, No. CA-99-255-3; Gray v. United States Defense Commissary Agency, No. CA-99-838-3 (E.D. Va. Apr. 21, 2001 & July 11, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer