Filed: Feb. 21, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-2381 MICHAEL J. SINDRAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COLUMBIA UNION COLLEGE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Frederic N. Smalkin, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-2954-S) Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: February 21, 2002 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael J. Sindram, Appel
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-2381 MICHAEL J. SINDRAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COLUMBIA UNION COLLEGE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Frederic N. Smalkin, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-2954-S) Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: February 21, 2002 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael J. Sindram, Appell..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2381
MICHAEL J. SINDRAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
COLUMBIA UNION COLLEGE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Frederic N. Smalkin, Chief District Judge.
(CA-01-2954-S)
Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: February 21, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael J. Sindram, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Michael Sindram appeals the district court orders denying his
motion for a temporary restraining order, holding his motion for a
preliminary injunction until a response was received by the defen-
dant and denying his motion for reconsideration. We dismiss the
appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the orders are not appeal-
able. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,
28 U.S.C.A. § 1291 (West 1993 & Supp. 2001), and certain inter-
locutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (West 1993 & Supp.
2001); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan
Corp.,
337 U.S. 541 (1949). The orders here appealed are neither
final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2