Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Romero-Gonzalez, 01-7997 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 01-7997 Visitors: 28
Filed: Feb. 27, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7997 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JESUS FRANCISCO ROMERO-GONZALEZ, a/k/a Jose E. Romero, a/k/a Jesus Gonazales, a/k/a Juan Pablo Martinez, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CR-99-244-A, CA-01-844-AM) Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: February 27, 2002 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG,
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7997 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JESUS FRANCISCO ROMERO-GONZALEZ, a/k/a Jose E. Romero, a/k/a Jesus Gonazales, a/k/a Juan Pablo Martinez, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CR-99-244-A, CA-01-844-AM) Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: February 27, 2002 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jesus Francisco Romero-Gonzalez, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Jesus Francisco Romero-Gonzalez seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Romero-Gonzalez, Nos. CR-99-244-A; CA-01-844-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 29, 2001). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer