Filed: Feb. 27, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7963 VICTOR QUINONES-GONDOLA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WARDEN; MAJOR, Worcester County Jail, Defendants - Appellees, and ASSISTANT DISTRICT DIRECTOR, INS; COMMIS- SIONERS INS; DOC INTERNAL AFFAIRS, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-01- 1846-MJG) Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: February 27, 2002 Before WIDENER,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7963 VICTOR QUINONES-GONDOLA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WARDEN; MAJOR, Worcester County Jail, Defendants - Appellees, and ASSISTANT DISTRICT DIRECTOR, INS; COMMIS- SIONERS INS; DOC INTERNAL AFFAIRS, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-01- 1846-MJG) Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: February 27, 2002 Before WIDENER, ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7963
VICTOR QUINONES-GONDOLA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WARDEN; MAJOR, Worcester County Jail,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
ASSISTANT DISTRICT DIRECTOR, INS; COMMIS-
SIONERS INS; DOC INTERNAL AFFAIRS,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-01-
1846-MJG)
Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: February 27, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Victor Quinones-Gondola, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Breads,
Jr., Columbia, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Victor Quinones-Gondola appeals the district court’s grant of
Appellees’ Motion for More Definite Statement. We dismiss the ap-
peal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here
appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory
or collateral order.
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We also deny
Quinones-Gondola’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2