Filed: Feb. 27, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7884 ALICIA MAGALLON GUERRERO, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SHELIA CLARK; MR. SHEPARD; JOHN PRIT; BARRY MILLER; DENISE CARTER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-01-765-2) Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: February 27, 2002 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublish
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7884 ALICIA MAGALLON GUERRERO, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SHELIA CLARK; MR. SHEPARD; JOHN PRIT; BARRY MILLER; DENISE CARTER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-01-765-2) Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: February 27, 2002 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublishe..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7884
ALICIA MAGALLON GUERRERO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SHELIA CLARK; MR. SHEPARD; JOHN PRIT; BARRY
MILLER; DENISE CARTER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.
(CA-01-765-2)
Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: February 27, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alicia Magallon Guerrero, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Alicia Magallon Guerrero appeals from the district court’s
order dismissing for improper venue her action pursuant to Bivens
v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S.
388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. Guerrero v. Clark, No. CA-01-
765-2 (E.D. Va. Oct. 23, 2001). We deny Guerrero’s motion for
injunction in which she seeks a transfer to a federal correctional
facility. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2