Filed: Mar. 05, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7715 ANTHONY S. COLEMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus J. BROWN, Deputy Sheriff; WAYNE MARKHAM, Food Director; MICHAEL WADE, Sheriff; R. GARRISON, Grievance Coordinator & Hearing Officer; MICHELLE BENTLEY, Kitchen Employee, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-01-714-AM) Submitted: February 21, 2002 Dec
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7715 ANTHONY S. COLEMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus J. BROWN, Deputy Sheriff; WAYNE MARKHAM, Food Director; MICHAEL WADE, Sheriff; R. GARRISON, Grievance Coordinator & Hearing Officer; MICHELLE BENTLEY, Kitchen Employee, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-01-714-AM) Submitted: February 21, 2002 Deci..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7715 ANTHONY S. COLEMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus J. BROWN, Deputy Sheriff; WAYNE MARKHAM, Food Director; MICHAEL WADE, Sheriff; R. GARRISON, Grievance Coordinator & Hearing Officer; MICHELLE BENTLEY, Kitchen Employee, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-01-714-AM) Submitted: February 21, 2002 Decided: March 5, 2002 Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony S. Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Anthony S. Coleman appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Coleman v. Brown, No. CA-01-714-AM (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 17, 2001 and entered Sept. 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
