Filed: Mar. 12, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7954 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RICHARD LEE EVANS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CR- 98-284-PJM, CA-00-2379-PJM) Submitted: February 21, 2002 Decided: March 12, 2002 Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Lee Evans,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7954 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RICHARD LEE EVANS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CR- 98-284-PJM, CA-00-2379-PJM) Submitted: February 21, 2002 Decided: March 12, 2002 Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Lee Evans, A..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7954 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RICHARD LEE EVANS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CR- 98-284-PJM, CA-00-2379-PJM) Submitted: February 21, 2002 Decided: March 12, 2002 Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Lee Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Suzanne Skalla, As- sistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Richard Lee Evans seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif- icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Evans, Nos. CR-98-284-PJM; CA-00-2379-PJM (D. Md., filed Oct. 31, 2001; entered Nov. 1, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2