Filed: Mar. 21, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-2187 HUEY L. HAMRICK, Petitioner, versus DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; KITT ENERGY CORPORATION, Respondents. On Petition of Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (00-600-BLA) Submitted: March 14, 2002 Decided: March 21, 2002 Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Huey L. Hamr
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-2187 HUEY L. HAMRICK, Petitioner, versus DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; KITT ENERGY CORPORATION, Respondents. On Petition of Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (00-600-BLA) Submitted: March 14, 2002 Decided: March 21, 2002 Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Huey L. Hamri..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2187
HUEY L. HAMRICK,
Petitioner,
versus
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR;
KITT ENERGY CORPORATION,
Respondents.
On Petition of Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
(00-600-BLA)
Submitted: March 14, 2002 Decided: March 21, 2002
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Huey L. Hamrick, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia May Nece, Jennifer U.
Toth, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C.; Richard
Phillips Johnson, Lexington, Kentucky, for Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Huey L. Hamrick seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s
decision and order dismissing his appeal from an Administrative Law
Judge’s decision denying his claim for black lung benefits as
untimely. We affirm.
A notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days from the
date upon which the decision or order of the ALJ was filed in the
Office of the District Director. See 20 C.F.R. § 802.205. The
ALJ’s decision and order were filed in the Office of the District
Director on July 31, 2001. Hamrick’s notice of appeal, postmarked
September 5, 2001, and received in the Office of the Clerk on Sep-
tember 10, 2001, is therefore untimely. See Dominion Coal Corp. v.
Honaker,
33 F.3d 401, 405 (4th Cir. 1994).
Accordingly, we affirm the Board’s order dismissing Hamrick’s
appeal as untimely. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2