Filed: Apr. 12, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7751 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SHANE FELLS, a/k/a Quasim Yusef Johnson, a/k/a Q, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-94-46, CA-00-795-5-H) Submitted: March 4, 2002 Decided: April 12, 2002 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished pe
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7751 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SHANE FELLS, a/k/a Quasim Yusef Johnson, a/k/a Q, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-94-46, CA-00-795-5-H) Submitted: March 4, 2002 Decided: April 12, 2002 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7751 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SHANE FELLS, a/k/a Quasim Yusef Johnson, a/k/a Q, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-94-46, CA-00-795-5-H) Submitted: March 4, 2002 Decided: April 12, 2002 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Shane Fells, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Shane Fells seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Fells, Nos. CR-94-46; CA-00-795- 5-H (E.D.N.C. filed July 18, 2001; entered July 24, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2