Filed: May 23, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6153 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KELLIS DION JACKSON, Defendant - Appellant. No. 02-6154 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KELLIS DION JACKSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CR-87-38-A, CA-01-1563-AM, CR-87-85-A, CA-02-139- AM) Submitted: May 16,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6153 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KELLIS DION JACKSON, Defendant - Appellant. No. 02-6154 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KELLIS DION JACKSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CR-87-38-A, CA-01-1563-AM, CR-87-85-A, CA-02-139- AM) Submitted: May 16, ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6153 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KELLIS DION JACKSON, Defendant - Appellant. No. 02-6154 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KELLIS DION JACKSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CR-87-38-A, CA-01-1563-AM, CR-87-85-A, CA-02-139- AM) Submitted: May 16, 2002 Decided: May 23, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kellis Dion Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Paul J. McNulty, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Kellis Dion Jackson seeks to appeal from the district court’s order construing his motion for a writ of habeas corpus as one filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001), and denying it. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jackson, Nos. CR-87-38-A; CR-87-85-A; CA-01-1563-AM; CA-02-139-AM (E.D. Va. Dec. 12, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2