Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Nicholson-El v. Conley, 02-6343 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 02-6343 Visitors: 5
Filed: May 23, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6343 WILLIAM E. NICHOLSON-EL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOYCE K. CONLEY; KATHLEEN HAWK, Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons; JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District Judge. (CA-01-798) Submitted: May 16, 2002 Decided: May 23, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAE
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6343 WILLIAM E. NICHOLSON-EL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOYCE K. CONLEY; KATHLEEN HAWK, Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons; JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District Judge. (CA-01-798) Submitted: May 16, 2002 Decided: May 23, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William E. Nicholson-El, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: William E. Nicholson-El appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Nicholson-El v. Conley, No. CA-01-798 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 30, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer