Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Johnson v. Medford, 02-6415 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 02-6415 Visitors: 33
Filed: Jun. 07, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6415 WAYNE THOMAS JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SUE MEDFORD, Nurse Supervisor at Marion Correctional Institution, in her official and individual capacity; SID HARKLEROAD, Superintendent at Marion Correctional Institution, in his official and individual capacity; ANGELA TWITTY, in her official and individual capacity; JANE DOE, in her official and individual capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United S
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6415 WAYNE THOMAS JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SUE MEDFORD, Nurse Supervisor at Marion Correctional Institution, in her official and individual capacity; SID HARKLEROAD, Superintendent at Marion Correctional Institution, in his official and individual capacity; ANGELA TWITTY, in her official and individual capacity; JANE DOE, in her official and individual capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-1-1-MU) Submitted: May 30, 2002 Decided: June 7, 2002 Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wayne Thomas Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Wayne Thomas Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Medford, No. CA- 02-1-1-MU (W.D.N.C. Feb. 26, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer