Filed: Jun. 06, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1063 ELDER LEWIS BANKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JEFFERSON SMURFIT CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CA-00-814-1) Submitted: May 30, 2002 Decided: June 6, 2002 Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Elder Lewis Banks, Appellant
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1063 ELDER LEWIS BANKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JEFFERSON SMURFIT CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CA-00-814-1) Submitted: May 30, 2002 Decided: June 6, 2002 Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Elder Lewis Banks, Appellant ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1063 ELDER LEWIS BANKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JEFFERSON SMURFIT CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CA-00-814-1) Submitted: May 30, 2002 Decided: June 6, 2002 Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Elder Lewis Banks, Appellant Pro Se. Fred Thurman Hamlet, Sr., Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Elder Lewis Banks appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to his former employer on his employment discrimination claims. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Banks v. Jefferson Smurfit Corp., No. CA-00-814-1 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 18, 2001). We also deny Banks’ motion to review the record in No. CA-00-144-1. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
